Convective Rainfall Rate
PGE05 SAFNWC

 

Table of contents
 

1.- Goal of CRR product 
2.- CRR algorithm summary description 
3.- List of inputs for CRR 
4.- Description of CRR outputs
5.- Example of CRR visualisation
 

Access to "Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document for ”Convective Rainfall Rate” (CRR - PGE05 v3.0)" for a more detailed description.

 

            The algorithm developed for the NWCSAF CRR product assume that clouds being both high and with large vertical extent are more likely to be raining, so that R = f(IR,VIS), being R the rainfall intensity expressed  in mm/h. By other side, the IR-WV brightness temperature difference is a useful parameter for extracting deep convective clouds with heavy rainfall (Kurino, T., 1996).

            The basic CRR mm/h value for each pixel is obtained from calibration matrices. The CRR calibration matrices are different if the software will use the solar channel or not. If a pixel belongs to a day mask and the solar channel is used the basic CRR calibration data is a 3-D matrix which uses the following bands: IR10.8, WV6.2 and VIS0.6. If a pixel belongs to a night mask or to a day mask but not using solar channel the basic calibration values are stored in a 2-D matrix and only two bands are used: IR10.8 and WV6.2. When the software uses the solar channel the normalised visible reflectances are obtained by dividing by the cosine of solar zenith angle.

            The calibration method, based on Rainsat techniques, tries to establish a statistical relationship between VIS reflectances, IR and WV temperatures and the rainfall rates derived from radar data. In summary, a composite radar data were compared pixel by pixel with a geographically matched MSG data in the same resolution and the total rain rate were calculated as a function of the two or three variables (IR brightness temperatures, IR-WV brightness temperature differences and normalised VIS reflectances). The radar data are used only for training the system and are not used directly as part of the output product.

            The retrieval of the basic CRR can be latitude dependant. In this case 2-D and 3-D difference matrices, made with the differences between the elements of Nordic and Spanish matrices, are needed in order to obtain the amount that must be added to the basic Spanish value, to obtain the latitude corrected value.

            In a second phase, a filtering process is performed in order to eliminate stratiform rain data which are not associated with convective clouds: the obtained basic CRR data are set to zero if all the nearest pixels in a grid of selected semisize (def. value: 3pix) centred on the pixel do not have an equal or higher value than a selected threshold (def. value: 3mm/h). The size of the grid and the filter threshold can be modified by the user through the configuration model.

            To take into account the temporal and spatial variability of the cloud tops, the amount of moisture available to produce rain and the influence of orographic effects on the precipitation distribution, several correction factors can be applied to the basic CRR value by the users. So that, the possible correction factors are the moisture correction, the cloud top growth/decaying rates or evolution correction, the cloud top temperature gradient correction  (Gilberto et all, 1998) and the orographic correction (Gilberto et all, 1999).

            This factor has been defined as the product of Precipitable Water, PW,  in the layer from the surface to 500 hPa and the Relative Humidity, RH, (mean values between the surface and the 500 hPa level) data, obtained from a numerical model. The PWRH factor takes values from 0.0 to 2.0, and the environment is considered dry if PWRH is significantly lower than 1.0 and quite moist if PWRH is greater than 1.0.

            Convective rain is assumed to be associated with growing clouds exhibiting overshooting tops. Consecutive satellite IR images are used to indicate vertically growing and decaying cloud systems.

            The cloud growth correction factor, also designated as evolution correction factor, only changes the magnitude of the rain rate through a coefficient if the analysed pixel becomes warmer in the second image.

            The cloud growth rate correction factor can not be applied when consecutive images are not available. In this case the alternative method of Cloud-top Temperature Gradient Correction is applied.

This correction factor, also designated as gradient correction factor, is based on a search of the highest (coldest) and lowest (less cold) cloud tops. The idea is to search for the pixels that are below the average cloud top surface temperature (local temperature minima) and assume these pixels indicate active convection associated with precipitation beneath.

The hessian of the temperature field is analysed for each pixel with a temperature lower than 250K, in order to search for those pixels with extreme values as is explained in the Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document[enlace]. Different coefficients will be applied modifying the rain rate corresponding to those pixels which have a maximum (meaning that are warmer than its surroundings) and those ones which have neither a local IR temperature maximum nor minimum. Otherwise rain rate is not modified.

To apply the orographic correction factor is necessary to know the exact cloud position with respect to the ground below. This is not a problem when a cloud is located directly below the satellite; however, as one looks away from the sub-satellite point, the cloud top appears to be farther away from the satellite than the cloud base. This effect increases as you get closer to the limb and as clouds get higher.

When the Parallax Correction is working, a spatial shift is applied to every pixel with precipitation according to the basic CRR value.

            4.-Description of CRR outputs

                        CRR product is coded in HDF5 format and its content is the following:  

                        The rainfall rates obtained by the CRR algorithm expressed in mm/h are converted into eleven classes as it is shown bellow: 

CLASSES

RAINFALL RATE (mm/h)

0

rate < 1

1

1 = rate < 2

2

2 = rate < 3

3

3 = rate < 5

4

5 = rate < 7

5

7 = rate < 10

6

10 = rate < 15

7

15 = rate < 20

8

20 = rate < 30

9

30 = rate < 50

10

rate = 50

 

              Rainfall rates from the images in the last hour are used in order to compute the hourly accumulation. This output is expressed in mm and includes a palette that uses the same colours as the classes output palette.

              Rainfall rates in mm/h are necessary to calculate the hourly accumulation. This is the reason for the existence of this output. It is not intended to be used as a Nowcasting tool, therefore it has no palette.

              7 bits mask indicating which corrections have been applied for each pixel. Moreover, it indicates whether the product is latitude dependant or not and if the SEVIRI solar channel has been used during the computation of the CRR:

1 bit for moisture correction:

0: No correction

1: Corrected by PWHR factor

1 bit for cloud growth rate correction:

0: No correction

1: Corrected by IR data from previous slot

1 bit for cloud top temperature correction:

0: No correction

1: Corrected by IR temperature gradient

1 bit for parallax correction:

0: No correction

1: Corrected by parallax

1 bit for orographic effect correction:

0: No correction

1: Corrected by orographic effects

1 bit for latitude dependant:

0: No latitude dependant

1: Latitude dependant

1 bit for solar channel used:

0: No solar channel used

1: Solar channel used

                        8 bits mask indicating the processing status of each pixel:

1 bit for IR10.8, WV6.2 or VIS0.6 data missing

0: All the channel data required are available

1: There is a missing data in some channel

1 bit to indicate if the set of SEVIRI data is out of the calibration matrices range

0: The set of SEVIRI data is contained in the calibration matrices range

1: The set of SEVIRI data is out of the calibration matrices range

1 bit to identify mathematical errors

0: No mathematical error

1: A mathematical error has occurred

1 bit for the convective filter

0: The CRR value remains the same

1: The CRR value has been set to zero because of the filtering process

1 bit for the filled holes after parallax correction

0: No hole due to the parallax correction

1: Hole due to the parallax correction filled by a median filter

2 bits the hourly accumulation CRR band status

0: All required bands were available

1: One previous CRR band is missing

2: At least two previous CRR bands are missing (no consecutive)

3: At least two previous CRR bands are missing (some are consecutive)

1 bit for the status of the CRR pixels used to compute the hourly accumulation

0: All the pixels used in the computing of the hourly accumulation have their CRR_DATAFLAG bits set to 0

1: At least one of the pixels used in the computing of the hourly accumulation has at least one of its CRR_DATAFLAG bits set to 1

 

            5.- Example of CRR visualisation

                      Instantaneous Rates       

          Below is shown an image corresponding to CRR classes output. It has been obtained at full resolution and all corrections have been applied.

                                                                                    Figure 1. CRR classes output corresponding to 11th September 2008 at 16:00Z.

 

                       Hourly Accumulations

           Below is shown an image corresponding to CRR hourly accumulations output. It has been obtained at full resolution and all corrections have been applied

                                                                                    Figure 2. CRR hourly accumulations output corresponding to 11th September 2008 at 16:30Z

 


 References:

-         Kidder, S.Q., and T.H. Vonder Haar, 1995: Satellite Meteorology: An Introduction. Academic Press

-         Scofield, R.A., 1987: The NESDIS operational convective precipitation estimation technique, Mon. Wea. Rev., Vol.115, pp.1773-1792.

-         Vicente, G.A. and R.A. Scofield, 1996: Experimental GOES-8/9 derived rainfall estimates for flash flood and hydrological applications, Proc. 1996 Meteorological Scientific User's Conference, Vienna, Austria, EUM P19, pp.89-96.

-         Kurino, T., 1996: A Rainfall Estimation with the GMS-5 Infrared Split-Window and Water Vapour Measurements, Tech. Rep., Meteorological Satellite Centre, Japan Meteorological Agency.

-         Schmetz J., S. S. Tjemkes, M. Gube and L. van de Berg, 1997: Monitoring deep convection and convective overshooting with METEOSAT. Adv. Space Res., Vol. 19, pp433-441.

-         Vicente, G.A., Scofield, R.A. and Menzel W.P. 1998: The Operational GOES Infrared Rainfall Estimation Technique, Bull. American Meteorological Society, Vol. 79, No. 9, pp. 1883-1898.

-         Vicente, G.A., Davenport, J.C. and Scofield, R.A., 1999: The role of orographic and parallax corrections on real time high resolution satellite rainfall estimation, Proc. 1999 Eumetsat Meteorological Satellite Data User's Conferences, EUM P26, pp. 161-168.

-         Grose AME, Smith EA, Chung HS, Ou ML, Sohn BJ, Turk FJ, 2002: Possibilities and limitations for quantitative precipitation forecasts using nowcasting methods with infrared geosynchronous satellite imagery. J. Appl. Meteor., Vol. 41, pp. 763-785.

-         Jorge Sánchez-Sesma and Marco Antonio Sosa: EPPrePMex, A Real-time Rainfall Estimation System Based on GOES-IR Satellite Imagery. IPWG, October 2004, Monterey, California, USA.

-         Bellon, A., Lovejoy, S and Austin, J. L., 1980: Combining satellite and radar data for the short range forecasting of precipitation. Mon. Wea. Rev., Vol. 108, pp.1554-1566.

-         Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document for ”Convective Rainfall Rate” (CRR - PGE05 v3.0), 2009

-         Product User Manual for “Convective Rainfall Rate” (CRR - PGE05 v3.0), 2009

-         Validation Report for “Convective Rainfall Rate” (CRR - PGE05 v3.0), 2009